Ideology Vs Political Party
April 24th, 2008Two items which need to be cleared up:
1) Democrat/Republican are political parties.
2) Liberal/Conservative are ideologies.
Political parties were set up to most accurately represent constituents ideologies.
On a sliding scale there is a lot of overlap.
This is important because each political party wants as many members as possible in order to win elections.
Generally speaking Democrats encompass those from far left socialist to more conservative traditional, strong defence, boot-strap-pulling types.
These are the types which have been increasingly ignored and impugned by their fellow Dems who happen to far more to the left. Not a good strategy.
Watch your politicians for a cue. Bill Clinton ran as a Centrist. He is now considered an icon to those on the left.
This is why most successful politicians tend to speak in generalities and resist being pinned down…they want to appeal to as many folks in their party as possible. Once elected, they are free to pursue their agenda as they see fit, but to get to that point broad appeal is a must.
Look at Hillary and her gun toting comments. In reality, she votes and speaks a very strong gun control line…but not when speaking to gun owning Dems. This is called “smart politics”, and it is.
The DNC ran candidates to the Right of vulnerable republican incumbents in 06…AND WON!
The Dems have, really, control of the House thanks to conservative Dems. Don’t be so quick to condemn them.
Changing parties or voting for a member of another party is as easy as flipping a switch, while changing one’s ideology or vision for America is akin to turning an aircraft carrier around. Flipping a switch is much easier, as the Dems who voted for Reagan demonstrated.
IMO, if the Dems don’t want to repeat such a scenario, they are going to have to be much more tolerant of differing views. If the left’s goal is for a Dem to win the White House, diversity and inclusion of their own voters is a must.
The same thing applies to the GOP as well.
Their supporters range from the religious right, through social, economic, constitutional conservatives, into neocons (who are much more liberal than the left gives them credit for).
The GOP has plenty of libs…Snowe, Collins, (McCain) etc and until recently Chaffey. Though out of step with the mainstream of the party they were still supported to maintain a majority in Congress.
To illustrate my earlier point about the aircraft carrier…look at Ron Paul’s success on the right. As the Gop drifts farther to the left a viable third party becomes more possible.
Tories, Whigs, etc..have all come and gone, and individual issues change but vision and ideology stays pretty consistent. Don’t get bogged down in semantics but the battles between left/right, conservative/liberal, socialism/capitalism will remain.


